Lowe 1660 vs SeaArk Predator 220 Hybrid: 5-year value retention (67% vs 67%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe 1660 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lowe 1660 comes out ahead, holding about 67% of its value versus 67% for the SeaArk Predator 220 Hybrid. Over the first five years the Lowe 1660 loses roughly $5,695 while the SeaArk Predator 220 Hybrid loses about $14,471 — a gap near $8,776.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe 1660 sheds about 16% in year one versus 8% for the SeaArk Predator 220 Hybrid. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…