Lowe 200 Cruise vs Shearwater 25 TE CC — Depreciation Comparison

Lowe 200 Cruise vs Shearwater 25 TE CC: 5-year value retention (61% vs 61%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe 200 Cruise holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Lowe 200 Cruise comes out ahead, holding about 61% of its value versus 61% for the Shearwater 25 TE CC. Over the first five years the Lowe 200 Cruise loses roughly $10,054 while the Shearwater 25 TE CC loses about $78,578 — a gap near $68,524.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe 200 Cruise sheds about 17% in year one versus 28% for the Shearwater 25 TE CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…