Lowe FM 1625 SC vs Lowe FM 1625 WT: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe FM 1625 SC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lowe FM 1625 SC comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Lowe FM 1625 WT. Over the first five years the Lowe FM 1625 SC loses roughly $6,953 while the Lowe FM 1625 WT loses about $7,527 — a gap near $574.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe FM 1625 SC sheds about 15% in year one versus 15% for the Lowe FM 1625 WT. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…