Lowe FM 1625 WT vs SeaArk 1648 Special: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe FM 1625 WT holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lowe FM 1625 WT comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the SeaArk 1648 Special. Over the first five years the Lowe FM 1625 WT loses roughly $7,527 while the SeaArk 1648 Special loses about $1,798 — a gap near $-5729.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe FM 1625 WT sheds about 15% in year one versus 15% for the SeaArk 1648 Special. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…