Alweld 1752 Mud vs Lowe FM 1675 SC: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alweld 1752 Mud holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alweld 1752 Mud comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Lowe FM 1675 SC. Over the first five years the Alweld 1752 Mud loses roughly $2,412 while the Lowe FM 1675 SC loses about $7,723 — a gap near $5,311.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alweld 1752 Mud sheds about 16% in year one versus 15% for the Lowe FM 1675 SC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…