Lowe FS 1625 vs SeaArk 2072SLD: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe FS 1625 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lowe FS 1625 comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the SeaArk 2072SLD. Over the first five years the Lowe FS 1625 loses roughly $8,031 while the SeaArk 2072SLD loses about $4,409 — a gap near $-3622.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe FS 1625 sheds about 14% in year one versus 16% for the SeaArk 2072SLD. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…