Lowe FS 1625 vs Sportsman Masters 207 CC: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe FS 1625 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lowe FS 1625 comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Sportsman Masters 207 CC. Over the first five years the Lowe FS 1625 loses roughly $8,031 while the Sportsman Masters 207 CC loses about $22,464 — a gap near $14,433.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe FS 1625 sheds about 14% in year one versus 11% for the Sportsman Masters 207 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…