Lowe FS 1900 vs SeaArk 2672 Workhorse: 5-year value retention (77% vs 77%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lowe FS 1900 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lowe FS 1900 comes out ahead, holding about 77% of its value versus 77% for the SeaArk 2672 Workhorse. Over the first five years the Lowe FS 1900 loses roughly $10,347 while the SeaArk 2672 Workhorse loses about $4,310 — a gap near $-6037.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lowe FS 1900 sheds about 14% in year one versus 12% for the SeaArk 2672 Workhorse. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…