Aluma Weld Xpress 1756D vs Lund 1600 Fury SS: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress 1756D holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress 1756D comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Lund 1600 Fury SS. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress 1756D loses roughly $1,776 while the Lund 1600 Fury SS loses about $7,137 — a gap near $5,361.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress 1756D sheds about 8% in year one versus 24% for the Lund 1600 Fury SS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…