Lund 1600 Fury vs Scout 277 LXF CC: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1600 Fury holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lund 1600 Fury comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Scout 277 LXF CC. Over the first five years the Lund 1600 Fury loses roughly $6,545 while the Scout 277 LXF CC loses about $68,522 — a gap near $61,977.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1600 Fury sheds about 24% in year one versus 28% for the Scout 277 LXF CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…