Lund 1625 Fury XL vs Xtreme 162 CC — Depreciation Comparison

Lund 1625 Fury XL vs Xtreme 162 CC: 5-year value retention (76% vs 76%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1625 Fury XL holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Lund 1625 Fury XL comes out ahead, holding about 76% of its value versus 76% for the Xtreme 162 CC. Over the first five years the Lund 1625 Fury XL loses roughly $4,287 while the Xtreme 162 CC loses about $2,861 — a gap near $-1426.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1625 Fury XL sheds about 5% in year one versus 5% for the Xtreme 162 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…