Allmand 26 CC vs Lund 1650 Angler SS — Depreciation Comparison

Allmand 26 CC vs Lund 1650 Angler SS: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Allmand 26 CC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Allmand 26 CC comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Lund 1650 Angler SS. Over the first five years the Allmand 26 CC loses roughly $12,678 while the Lund 1650 Angler SS loses about $8,923 — a gap near $-3755.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Allmand 26 CC sheds about 6% in year one versus 23% for the Lund 1650 Angler SS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…