Aluma Weld Xpress SW22B Saltwatr Trlr BS vs Lund 1650 Rebel XL: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1650 Rebel XL holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lund 1650 Rebel XL comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Aluma Weld Xpress SW22B Saltwatr Trlr BS. Over the first five years the Lund 1650 Rebel XL loses roughly $9,650 while the Aluma Weld Xpress SW22B Saltwatr Trlr BS loses about $11,090 — a gap near $1,440.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1650 Rebel XL sheds about 24% in year one versus 21% for the Aluma Weld Xpress SW22B Saltwatr Trlr BS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…