Alweld 1552 Flat Marsh SC Pkg vs Lund 1675 Pro Guide: 5-year value retention (74% vs 74%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1675 Pro Guide holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lund 1675 Pro Guide comes out ahead, holding about 74% of its value versus 74% for the Alweld 1552 Flat Marsh SC Pkg. Over the first five years the Lund 1675 Pro Guide loses roughly $7,246 while the Alweld 1552 Flat Marsh SC Pkg loses about $1,624 — a gap near $-5622.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1675 Pro Guide sheds about 6% in year one versus 7% for the Alweld 1552 Flat Marsh SC Pkg. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…