Lund 1600 Alaskan vs Lund 1760 Predator SC: 5-year value retention (69% vs 69%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1600 Alaskan holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lund 1600 Alaskan comes out ahead, holding about 69% of its value versus 69% for the Lund 1760 Predator SC. Over the first five years the Lund 1600 Alaskan loses roughly $9,747 while the Lund 1760 Predator SC loses about $9,163 — a gap near $-584.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1600 Alaskan sheds about 10% in year one versus 24% for the Lund 1760 Predator SC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…