Lund 1775 Impact SS vs Ranger RB190 Bay — Depreciation Comparison

Lund 1775 Impact SS vs Ranger RB190 Bay: 5-year value retention (79% vs 79%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1775 Impact SS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Lund 1775 Impact SS comes out ahead, holding about 79% of its value versus 79% for the Ranger RB190 Bay. Over the first five years the Lund 1775 Impact SS loses roughly $7,122 while the Ranger RB190 Bay loses about $7,769 — a gap near $647.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1775 Impact SS sheds about 4% in year one versus 9% for the Ranger RB190 Bay. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…