Alweld 1656 Flat Marsh RD Pkg vs Lund 1775 Impact XS Sport — Depreciation Comparison

Alweld 1656 Flat Marsh RD Pkg vs Lund 1775 Impact XS Sport: 5-year value retention (70% vs 70%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alweld 1656 Flat Marsh RD Pkg holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Alweld 1656 Flat Marsh RD Pkg comes out ahead, holding about 70% of its value versus 70% for the Lund 1775 Impact XS Sport. Over the first five years the Alweld 1656 Flat Marsh RD Pkg loses roughly $2,180 while the Lund 1775 Impact XS Sport loses about $16,373 — a gap near $14,193.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alweld 1656 Flat Marsh RD Pkg sheds about 21% in year one versus 24% for the Lund 1775 Impact XS Sport. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…