H2O Sports 2000 CC vs Lund 1870 Predator: 5-year value retention (74% vs 74%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1870 Predator holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lund 1870 Predator comes out ahead, holding about 74% of its value versus 74% for the H2O Sports 2000 CC. Over the first five years the Lund 1870 Predator loses roughly $7,814 while the H2O Sports 2000 CC loses about $5,764 — a gap near $-2050.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1870 Predator sheds about 9% in year one versus 5% for the H2O Sports 2000 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…