Havoc 1653 Mstc vs Lund 1875 Crossover XS: 5-year value retention (74% vs 74%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Havoc 1653 Mstc holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Havoc 1653 Mstc comes out ahead, holding about 74% of its value versus 74% for the Lund 1875 Crossover XS. Over the first five years the Havoc 1653 Mstc loses roughly $2,847 while the Lund 1875 Crossover XS loses about $17,644 — a gap near $14,797.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Havoc 1653 Mstc sheds about 26% in year one versus 18% for the Lund 1875 Crossover XS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…