Lund 1875 Fisherman Sport vs SeaArk RX160 CC: 5-year value retention (76% vs 76%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1875 Fisherman Sport holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lund 1875 Fisherman Sport comes out ahead, holding about 76% of its value versus 76% for the SeaArk RX160 CC. Over the first five years the Lund 1875 Fisherman Sport loses roughly $13,828 while the SeaArk RX160 CC loses about $2,570 — a gap near $-11258.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1875 Fisherman Sport sheds about 19% in year one versus 7% for the SeaArk RX160 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…