Alumacraft Classic 165 Sport vs Lund 1875 Pro V Sport: 5-year value retention (71% vs 71%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Alumacraft Classic 165 Sport holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Alumacraft Classic 165 Sport comes out ahead, holding about 71% of its value versus 71% for the Lund 1875 Pro V Sport. Over the first five years the Alumacraft Classic 165 Sport loses roughly $4,660 while the Lund 1875 Pro V Sport loses about $23,469 — a gap near $18,809.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Alumacraft Classic 165 Sport sheds about 10% in year one versus 19% for the Lund 1875 Pro V Sport. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…