Cougar Challenger 176 Z Pro CC vs Lund 2075 Tyee Magnum: 5-year value retention (80% vs 80%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Cougar Challenger 176 Z Pro CC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Cougar Challenger 176 Z Pro CC comes out ahead, holding about 80% of its value versus 80% for the Lund 2075 Tyee Magnum. Over the first five years the Cougar Challenger 176 Z Pro CC loses roughly $4,131 while the Lund 2075 Tyee Magnum loses about $15,725 — a gap near $11,594.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Cougar Challenger 176 Z Pro CC sheds about 4% in year one versus 5% for the Lund 2075 Tyee Magnum. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…