Aluma Weld Xpress X17 Pro BS vs Mako 334 CC: 5-year value retention (70% vs 70%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress X17 Pro BS holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress X17 Pro BS comes out ahead, holding about 70% of its value versus 70% for the Mako 334 CC. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress X17 Pro BS loses roughly $7,242 while the Mako 334 CC loses about $104,944 — a gap near $97,702.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress X17 Pro BS sheds about 6% in year one versus 8% for the Mako 334 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…