Mako Pro Skiff 19 CC vs Mirrocraft Northport F145SC: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Mako Pro Skiff 19 CC holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Mako Pro Skiff 19 CC comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Mirrocraft Northport F145SC. Over the first five years the Mako Pro Skiff 19 CC loses roughly $14,581 while the Mirrocraft Northport F145SC loses about $3,599 — a gap near $-10982.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Mako Pro Skiff 19 CC sheds about 18% in year one versus 22% for the Mirrocraft Northport F145SC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…