Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ vs Stingray 172SC: 5-year value retention (63% vs 63%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ comes out ahead, holding about 63% of its value versus 63% for the Stingray 172SC. Over the first five years the Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ loses roughly $90,057 while the Stingray 172SC loses about $12,641 — a gap near $-77416.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ sheds about 32% in year one versus 25% for the Stingray 172SC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…