Aluma Weld Xpress H20B Xtrm Bay Stnls BS vs Mitzi Skiffs 16 Shallow Tunnel FO — Depreciation Comparison

Aluma Weld Xpress H20B Xtrm Bay Stnls BS vs Mitzi Skiffs 16 Shallow Tunnel FO: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Aluma Weld Xpress H20B Xtrm Bay Stnls BS holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Aluma Weld Xpress H20B Xtrm Bay Stnls BS comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Mitzi Skiffs 16 Shallow Tunnel FO. Over the first five years the Aluma Weld Xpress H20B Xtrm Bay Stnls BS loses roughly $10,314 while the Mitzi Skiffs 16 Shallow Tunnel FO loses about $5,865 — a gap near $-4449.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Aluma Weld Xpress H20B Xtrm Bay Stnls BS sheds about 22% in year one versus 20% for the Mitzi Skiffs 16 Shallow Tunnel FO. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…