Mitzi Skiffs 17 CC FO vs Mitzi Skiffs 17 Tiller FO: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Mitzi Skiffs 17 CC FO holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Mitzi Skiffs 17 CC FO comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Mitzi Skiffs 17 Tiller FO. Over the first five years the Mitzi Skiffs 17 CC FO loses roughly $5,789 while the Mitzi Skiffs 17 Tiller FO loses about $5,372 — a gap near $-417.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Mitzi Skiffs 17 CC FO sheds about 20% in year one versus 20% for the Mitzi Skiffs 17 Tiller FO. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…