Boston Whaler 285 CD vs Mitzi Skiffs 17 Trnmnt Shallow Tnnl FO: 5-year value retention (66% vs 66%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Boston Whaler 285 CD holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Boston Whaler 285 CD comes out ahead, holding about 66% of its value versus 66% for the Mitzi Skiffs 17 Trnmnt Shallow Tnnl FO. Over the first five years the Boston Whaler 285 CD loses roughly $117,298 while the Mitzi Skiffs 17 Trnmnt Shallow Tnnl FO loses about $7,707 — a gap near $-109591.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Boston Whaler 285 CD sheds about 29% in year one versus 21% for the Mitzi Skiffs 17 Trnmnt Shallow Tnnl FO. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…