Lund 1660 Predator vs Nautic Star 251 Hybrid CC: 5-year value retention (67% vs 67%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1660 Predator holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Lund 1660 Predator comes out ahead, holding about 67% of its value versus 67% for the Nautic Star 251 Hybrid CC. Over the first five years the Lund 1660 Predator loses roughly $8,797 while the Nautic Star 251 Hybrid CC loses about $53,477 — a gap near $44,680.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1660 Predator sheds about 11% in year one versus 17% for the Nautic Star 251 Hybrid CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…