Nucamp Rv CS S vs Shasta By Forest River 18FQ — Depreciation Comparison

Nucamp Rv CS S vs Shasta By Forest River 18FQ: 5-year value retention (62% vs 62%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Nucamp Rv CS S holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Nucamp Rv CS S comes out ahead, holding about 62% of its value versus 62% for the Shasta By Forest River 18FQ. Over the first five years the Nucamp Rv CS S loses roughly $14,064 while the Shasta By Forest River 18FQ loses about $10,557 — a gap near $-3507.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Nucamp Rv CS S sheds about 13% in year one versus 27% for the Shasta By Forest River 18FQ. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…