Polar Kraft 2010 T vs SeaArk RXV186 SC: 5-year value retention (81% vs 81%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Polar Kraft 2010 T holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Polar Kraft 2010 T comes out ahead, holding about 81% of its value versus 81% for the SeaArk RXV186 SC. Over the first five years the Polar Kraft 2010 T loses roughly $4,301 while the SeaArk RXV186 SC loses about $2,833 — a gap near $-1468.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Polar Kraft 2010 T sheds about 4% in year one versus 5% for the SeaArk RXV186 SC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…