Ranger 1880MS vs RH Aluminum 190 Sea Hawk: 5-year value retention (80% vs 80%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Ranger 1880MS holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Ranger 1880MS comes out ahead, holding about 80% of its value versus 80% for the RH Aluminum 190 Sea Hawk. Over the first five years the Ranger 1880MS loses roughly $14,745 while the RH Aluminum 190 Sea Hawk loses about $6,081 — a gap near $-8664.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Ranger 1880MS sheds about 17% in year one versus 10% for the RH Aluminum 190 Sea Hawk. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…