Ranger 190LS vs Tracker 450 TF — Depreciation Comparison

Ranger 190LS vs Tracker 450 TF: 5-year value retention (86% vs 86%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Tracker 450 TF holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Tracker 450 TF comes out ahead, holding about 86% of its value versus 86% for the Ranger 190LS. Over the first five years the Tracker 450 TF loses roughly $4,018 while the Ranger 190LS loses about $6,706 — a gap near $2,688.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Tracker 450 TF sheds about 3% in year one versus 3% for the Ranger 190LS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…