Ranger 220C vs SeaArk RX160 SC: 5-year value retention (76% vs 76%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Ranger 220C holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Ranger 220C comes out ahead, holding about 76% of its value versus 76% for the SeaArk RX160 SC. Over the first five years the Ranger 220C loses roughly $10,682 while the SeaArk RX160 SC loses about $2,507 — a gap near $-8175.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Ranger 220C sheds about 8% in year one versus 7% for the SeaArk RX160 SC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…