Ranger 620FS Ranger CUP vs RH Aluminum 22 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy — Depreciation Comparison

Ranger 620FS Ranger CUP vs RH Aluminum 22 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy: 5-year value retention (81% vs 81%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Ranger 620FS Ranger CUP holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Ranger 620FS Ranger CUP comes out ahead, holding about 81% of its value versus 81% for the RH Aluminum 22 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy. Over the first five years the Ranger 620FS Ranger CUP loses roughly $13,804 while the RH Aluminum 22 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy loses about $13,526 — a gap near $-278.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Ranger 620FS Ranger CUP sheds about 4% in year one versus 2% for the RH Aluminum 22 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…