Haynie 19 R T CC vs Ranger RT178 — Depreciation Comparison

Haynie 19 R T CC vs Ranger RT178: 5-year value retention (80% vs 80%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Haynie 19 R T CC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Haynie 19 R T CC comes out ahead, holding about 80% of its value versus 80% for the Ranger RT178. Over the first five years the Haynie 19 R T CC loses roughly $5,231 while the Ranger RT178 loses about $5,831 — a gap near $600.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Haynie 19 R T CC sheds about 4% in year one versus 14% for the Ranger RT178. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…