Regal 1900 ES vs Regal 33 SAV — Depreciation Comparison

Regal 1900 ES vs Regal 33 SAV: 5-year value retention (64% vs 64%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Regal 1900 ES holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Regal 1900 ES comes out ahead, holding about 64% of its value versus 64% for the Regal 33 SAV. Over the first five years the Regal 1900 ES loses roughly $17,793 while the Regal 33 SAV loses about $194,280 — a gap near $176,487.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Regal 1900 ES sheds about 9% in year one versus 30% for the Regal 33 SAV. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…