Ranger 2660 Bay vs RH Aluminum 20 Coastal — Depreciation Comparison

Ranger 2660 Bay vs RH Aluminum 20 Coastal: 5-year value retention (79% vs 79%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. RH Aluminum 20 Coastal holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the RH Aluminum 20 Coastal comes out ahead, holding about 79% of its value versus 79% for the Ranger 2660 Bay. Over the first five years the RH Aluminum 20 Coastal loses roughly $8,444 while the Ranger 2660 Bay loses about $31,830 — a gap near $23,386.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the RH Aluminum 20 Coastal sheds about 11% in year one versus 16% for the Ranger 2660 Bay. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…