Lowe 1860 Deluxe Tiller vs RH Aluminum 200 Sea Hawk: 5-year value retention (83% vs 83%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. RH Aluminum 200 Sea Hawk holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the RH Aluminum 200 Sea Hawk comes out ahead, holding about 83% of its value versus 83% for the Lowe 1860 Deluxe Tiller. Over the first five years the RH Aluminum 200 Sea Hawk loses roughly $5,426 while the Lowe 1860 Deluxe Tiller loses about $3,420 — a gap near $-2006.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the RH Aluminum 200 Sea Hawk sheds about 9% in year one versus 12% for the Lowe 1860 Deluxe Tiller. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…