Lund 1775 Adventure Sport vs RH Aluminum 24 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy XL — Depreciation Comparison

Lund 1775 Adventure Sport vs RH Aluminum 24 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy XL: 5-year value retention (73% vs 73%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Lund 1775 Adventure Sport holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Lund 1775 Adventure Sport comes out ahead, holding about 73% of its value versus 73% for the RH Aluminum 24 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy XL. Over the first five years the Lund 1775 Adventure Sport loses roughly $12,155 while the RH Aluminum 24 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy XL loses about $27,565 — a gap near $15,410.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Lund 1775 Adventure Sport sheds about 20% in year one versus 8% for the RH Aluminum 24 Sea Hawk Pro Cuddy XL. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…