Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 397TH vs Salem By Forest River 30QBSS — Depreciation Comparison

Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 397TH vs Salem By Forest River 30QBSS: 5-year value retention (53% vs 53%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 397TH holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 397TH comes out ahead, holding about 53% of its value versus 53% for the Salem By Forest River 30QBSS. Over the first five years the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 397TH loses roughly $77,930 while the Salem By Forest River 30QBSS loses about $17,219 — a gap near $-60711.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Grand Design Recreational Vehicles 397TH sheds about 20% in year one versus 9% for the Salem By Forest River 30QBSS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…