Scamp Layout A vs Viking By Forest River 17RD: 5-year value retention (72% vs 72%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Scamp Layout A holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Scamp Layout A comes out ahead, holding about 72% of its value versus 72% for the Viking By Forest River 17RD. Over the first five years the Scamp Layout A loses roughly $9,249 while the Viking By Forest River 17RD loses about $5,170 — a gap near $-4079.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Scamp Layout A sheds about 19% in year one versus 6% for the Viking By Forest River 17RD. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…