Scamp Scamp 16 Layout 4 vs Starcraft 188BHS: 5-year value retention (59% vs 59%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Scamp Scamp 16 Layout 4 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Scamp Scamp 16 Layout 4 comes out ahead, holding about 59% of its value versus 59% for the Starcraft 188BHS. Over the first five years the Scamp Scamp 16 Layout 4 loses roughly $8,381 while the Starcraft 188BHS loses about $13,154 — a gap near $4,773.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Scamp Scamp 16 Layout 4 sheds about 9% in year one versus 22% for the Starcraft 188BHS. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…