Mitzi Skiffs 16 Shallow Tunnel FO vs Scarab 255 Open ID Fishing Pkg: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Mitzi Skiffs 16 Shallow Tunnel FO holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Mitzi Skiffs 16 Shallow Tunnel FO comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the Scarab 255 Open ID Fishing Pkg. Over the first five years the Mitzi Skiffs 16 Shallow Tunnel FO loses roughly $5,865 while the Scarab 255 Open ID Fishing Pkg loses about $32,669 — a gap near $26,804.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Mitzi Skiffs 16 Shallow Tunnel FO sheds about 20% in year one versus 11% for the Scarab 255 Open ID Fishing Pkg. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…