Mitzi Skiffs 17 Trnmnt Shallow Tnnl FO vs Scout 305 LXF W Seakeeper CC: 5-year value retention (66% vs 66%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Mitzi Skiffs 17 Trnmnt Shallow Tnnl FO holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Mitzi Skiffs 17 Trnmnt Shallow Tnnl FO comes out ahead, holding about 66% of its value versus 66% for the Scout 305 LXF W Seakeeper CC. Over the first five years the Mitzi Skiffs 17 Trnmnt Shallow Tnnl FO loses roughly $7,707 while the Scout 305 LXF W Seakeeper CC loses about $176,887 — a gap near $169,180.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Mitzi Skiffs 17 Trnmnt Shallow Tnnl FO sheds about 21% in year one versus 28% for the Scout 305 LXF W Seakeeper CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…