Pathfinder 2200 TRS CC vs Sea Hunt BX 25 FS CC — Depreciation Comparison

Pathfinder 2200 TRS CC vs Sea Hunt BX 25 FS CC: 5-year value retention (65% vs 65%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Sea Hunt BX 25 FS CC holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the Sea Hunt BX 25 FS CC comes out ahead, holding about 65% of its value versus 65% for the Pathfinder 2200 TRS CC. Over the first five years the Sea Hunt BX 25 FS CC loses roughly $52,845 while the Pathfinder 2200 TRS CC loses about $38,771 — a gap near $-14074.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Sea Hunt BX 25 FS CC sheds about 32% in year one versus 16% for the Pathfinder 2200 TRS CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…