Polar Kraft 1860 vs Sea Hunt Ultra 225 CC: 5-year value retention (74% vs 74%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. Polar Kraft 1860 holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the Polar Kraft 1860 comes out ahead, holding about 74% of its value versus 74% for the Sea Hunt Ultra 225 CC. Over the first five years the Polar Kraft 1860 loses roughly $2,253 while the Sea Hunt Ultra 225 CC loses about $15,758 — a gap near $13,505.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the Polar Kraft 1860 sheds about 5% in year one versus 5% for the Sea Hunt Ultra 225 CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…