SeaArk 1652MVT vs Shallow Stalker 20 Deluxe CC — Depreciation Comparison

SeaArk 1652MVT vs Shallow Stalker 20 Deluxe CC: 5-year value retention (67% vs 67%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. SeaArk 1652MVT holds its value better.

On five-year value retention the SeaArk 1652MVT comes out ahead, holding about 67% of its value versus 67% for the Shallow Stalker 20 Deluxe CC. Over the first five years the SeaArk 1652MVT loses roughly $2,134 while the Shallow Stalker 20 Deluxe CC loses about $21,107 — a gap near $18,973.

First-year drop is the biggest factor: the SeaArk 1652MVT sheds about 15% in year one versus 23% for the Shallow Stalker 20 Deluxe CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.

Loading the interactive terminal…