SeaArk 1660MV vs SeaArk Predator 220FS CC: 5-year value retention (68% vs 68%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. SeaArk 1660MV holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the SeaArk 1660MV comes out ahead, holding about 68% of its value versus 68% for the SeaArk Predator 220FS CC. Over the first five years the SeaArk 1660MV loses roughly $2,340 while the SeaArk Predator 220FS CC loses about $13,404 — a gap near $11,064.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the SeaArk 1660MV sheds about 15% in year one versus 8% for the SeaArk Predator 220FS CC. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…