Alweld 1760VV Marsh Pro Package vs SeaArk 2672MV: 5-year value retention (71% vs 71%), resale value, and cost of ownership head-to-head. SeaArk 2672MV holds its value better.
On five-year value retention the SeaArk 2672MV comes out ahead, holding about 71% of its value versus 71% for the Alweld 1760VV Marsh Pro Package. Over the first five years the SeaArk 2672MV loses roughly $3,603 while the Alweld 1760VV Marsh Pro Package loses about $3,260 — a gap near $-343.
First-year drop is the biggest factor: the SeaArk 2672MV sheds about 14% in year one versus 21% for the Alweld 1760VV Marsh Pro Package. If you buy used, the steeper early drop is what the original owner absorbs.
Loading the interactive terminal…